Talk:Kharkiv School of Photography

"Peacock" language

Piotrus‎, thank you for being more specific. Let's delve into this "peacock" language to figure out the best course of action.

1. Just in case you didn't realize this, the statement of this fact (KSOP being "one of the most notable") is appropriately sourced. As usually encouraged by Wiki policies, the intro of the article doesn't cite the sources directly, but summarizes facts established in the article body. The fact in question is referenced in section Formation and relationship with socialist realism. As you can verify, the source states "одна з найвизначніших течій українського мистецства радянської доби" (Google Translate would render for you: "one of the most significant currents of Ukrainian art of the Soviet era").
2. The second aspect which I'd like to point out that this is not an unusual fact in any shape or form. Instead, not many artistic manifestations out of Soviet Ukraine have gotten any kind of international recognition at all, so for the period and for the geography, KSOP objectively stood out, and this is quite obvious within the field.
3. Finally, let's adhere to Wiki policies here. From your perspective, what specific verbiage of what policy (if any) dictates to censor or, perhaps, to tone down the above fact? 凰兰时罗 (talk) 16:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

   凰兰时罗, Thank you for the reply. Can I ask that you copy the reference to the lead (with a quotation and translation of it)? This should address any issues. Without a reference, the statement gives the impression of being WP:UNDUE and WP:PEACOCKish. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Derzhprom - 04.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC)