Talk:Khojavend District

Location wrong

The 40.033333, 47.416667 do not fit to the text "occupation". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.183.62.199 (talk) 19:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Merge

I don't think a merge makes sense - Khojavend and Martuni are not coterminous, so there's no reason they should share an article. --Golbez 07:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

I completely disagree since 1) Martuni was a district in Soviet times with it's own boundaries - deserving its own article even on that basis alone, and 2) on the ground, in reality, there is a district of Martuni which has the same boundaries as the old, and which has a government, population, etc, who all call it Martuni. The new district of Khojavend on the other hand has never existed in reality. --RaffiKojian 02:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khojavend District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091114093402/http://www.azstat.org/statinfo/demoqraphic/en/2_1.shtml to http://www.azstat.org/statinfo/demoqraphic/en/2_1.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Xəritə

@CuriousGolden: bu xəritədəki təmas xətti 27.09.2020-yə qədər olan təmas xəttidir. 09.11.2020 tarixindən o təmas xətti yoxdur artıq.--Samral (talk) 17:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Bilirəm. Bu xəritələr bir neçə həftəyə yenilənəcək. Onu gözləsək daha yaxşı olar. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 17:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

A different route to 66

"is an administrative district of Azerbaijan - one of the 66 such districts in the Republic." is best for the lead IMHO as it states what it is - a district. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

And how does the current lead not state that it's a district? "is one of the 66 districts". Your proposal makes this short phrase into a long sentence, which is unnecessary. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 15:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

It's not about brevity; it's about putting the main, indeed the only pertinant, fact first, namely that it is administrative district. All other facts are secondary to this fact. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

That really doesn't matter. In fact, most province/district articles don't immediately start with "is a province". For example articles of provinces of Iran (example: West Azerbaijan Province) starts with "is one of the 31 provinces of Iran" or Syunik Province in Armenia which starts with "is the southernmost province", which by your definition should be something like "is a province in southernmost Armenia". These are small and really unnecessary changes that would be better untouched. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 17:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)