Talk:Khraniteli/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Some Dude From North Carolina in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 15:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Basic stuff and comments

edit
  • Add alt text to both images.
  • Done.
  • Lead and #Context look good.
  • Thanks.
  • Noted.
  • "entertains them at table" - word missing?
  • None that I can see. Maybe this is a British English thing.
Shouldn't it be "at a table"? Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Fixed.
  • Remove the comma after "in the snow to Bree".
  • Done.
  • Remove the comma after "bridge across a chasm".
  • Done.
  • Change "realise" to "realize" - AE and consistency.
  • Done.
  • What is the purpose of the #Crew section. Is this not covered in the infobox?
  • Well, the infobox summarizes the key points of the article, several of which are in this section; the section covers also production design and costume design, not in the infobox.
Well, then I would suggest adding sources for the rest of the crew. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Added.
  • Archive sources for future use (you can use this tool or do it manually).
  • Done.

Progress

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·