Talk:Khutughtu Khan Kusala

Move?

there are a bunch of dbl redirects here that need to be fixed--Jiang 09:56, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Are we going to have some consistency here? We either use khan names or Chinese names, but keep it consistent. since no one wants to fix the redirects, Ill be moving this back to the khan name --Jiang 07:23, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Fixed. --[[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 16:34, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

copied from User_talk:Nanshu

I am curious as to why you moved this article? It is more common to see the individual referred to with this name than by their Khan name. The previous/next incumbants are now redlinks, despite these individuals having articles. --[[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 16:07, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

More common for whom? The Chinese? I think I confirm to the current academic trend. The Japanese version is put at "コシラ" (koshira < Qoshila < Kushala). It was moved from "明宗 (元朝)" to the current page by らりた and Safkan.

Also, your scheme is inappropriate. Don't judge at title what the Khubilaid empire was. It is hightly controversial. Actually "Yuan China" is Chinese POV that is actively challenged by scholars.

I don't care much about redlinks as this is an inactive field. If you do, then please make redirects until the ongoing project will be completed. --Nanshu 01:14, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Father's name

Is Khayishan Külüg Khan the same as Emperor Wuzong? Ardric47 08:33, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Name

Are you sure the name is supposed to be transcribed as “Qutuɤtu qaɤan” rather than “Qutuɣtu qaɣan”? Wikipeditor 03:09, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Article name

See Talk:Toghon Temür#Names. Should there be a rename of this article? --Evecurid (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)