 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the ZuiTube page were merged into KidZui on 21 April 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Engine?
edit..... so... what engine does this commie browser use? Pleeeeeaase don't tell me it's Trident, that would constitute burning of people.
is this safe from spywares, adwares, and the like? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.111.71.30 (talk) 06:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- I first heard of this from AMO as a browser add-on (link currently at bottom of article), not a full-fledged browser itself; maybe it's based on Firefox? B7T (talk) 21:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Content
editThis article uses the company infobox, but mainly describes a software package. I would like the software infobox information added to the article; it might also be suitable to separate the article into two.
The information on content selection is also a bit scanty. I'd be fascinated to know how it classes Wikipedia, for instance.
Finally, frankly, some of the article sounds as if it was sourced, directly or indirectly, from promotional materials. It might be improved by a de-peacock, a de-weasel, and a criticism section. 75.156.133.118 (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Adding "references" from popular magazines (sourced from the company, no less) into company PR does not make it a legitimate article. Pls strip out the PR intro. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.215.197.163 (talk) 12:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)