Wikipedia

Talk:Kidlington

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 78.144.161.114 in topic Suburb or large village?
whether or not the community would be better served by town status, the change was voted down in a ballot by 98% of the ageing electorate

And what percentage of the non-ageing electorate? =;) There's a serious point there, though: I don't know this place, but if the result was as clear-cut as 98% then, unless almost no younger people voted at all (and if so, that should be mentioned), that group too must have voted heavily against town status. Loganberry (Talk) 01:07, 15 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

A major event in the Kidlington Calendar is the annual barge race held thrice yearly.

I'm a Kidlington resident and I've never heard of this, but anyway: is it *annual*, or is it *thrice yearly*? It can't be both! I also come from Kidlington and I have never heard of this "major" event before.

I've removed the reference to the barge race because of the vague nature of the statement (annual? and does thrice yearly mean three times per year, or does it mean once every three years?). Also, I haven't been able to find anyone who has heard of this. By all means reinstate this section, but it should be more accurately written. In any case, it's hardly a *major* event, because I've lived in Kidlington for more than 10 years and I've never heard of it.

Davee

I have taken out the quotes around the words "village" because Kidlington is for the time being a village, as discussed at length in the article, and I think it over stresses this discussion to the detriment of a useful entry about Kidlington as it is. I agree that one of the interesting things about Kidlington is that it vies for being the largest village in England.

I have changed the word "centre" to "edge" when describing the position of the church. Even today it is definitely right on the edge, having water meadows directly behind it.

I have altered the distance from Oxford to 7 miles (12 km) for accuracy.

I am not sure that the village is expanding in all directions as stated. If people an say here how then I will leave it alone, but otherwise I would propose that that sentence is removed, as Kidlington has not expanded physically at its boundaries in the 20 years I have been here.

"There are as many 18th century (Georgian) buildings as modern houses" This may be true of one road, the one leading up from the Church, Church St, but is not true of the rest of Kidlington. Kidlington stretched up Church St to bits around High St and Oxford Rd and in the early 20th Century much ribbon development occured along the main road. The infill estates behind came subsequently.

"A number of industrial districts and parks" is a bit strong, there is only really one area which is to the North, where there is light industry, the motor park and the offices near the airport.

"It has so far resisted all proposals to become a town" Have there been many? I have heard of the one, which ended in a vote against.

86.3.133.80 07:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the external links to football clubs and to a residents association as these are no more important than scores of similar associations, clubs and societies that exist in Kidlington. Or should we list them all? I venture to suggest that we should only list those relevant to Kidlington as a geographic and historical entity. People can always go to the place where the associations and clubs are all listed, the Parish Council site. This is listed as an external link.

86.3.134.182 18:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have re-inserted the reference to Kidlington Football Club. Being the premier football club in the locality and competing in The F.A. Cup, F.A Vase, and F.A. Youth cup as well as many local and regional leagues it is definitely Kidlington’s premier sporting club and therefore deserves a mention. Simon Dickens —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.109.190.88 (talk) 13:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kidlington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tourism

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/residents-baffled-as-chinese-tourists-flock-to-take-selfies-in-humdrum-oxfordshire-village-a3290026.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-36706591

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-36733450 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.110.180.141 (talk) 23:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kidlington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kidlington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Suburb or large village?

edit
Latest comment: 2 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

At  01:54, 23 May 2024, Wikipedia editor "Luna Char" changed the first line of this article to describe Kidlington as a suburb instead of a large village.  I suggest that this is an American sense of the word, and in British English it means a residential area outside the city centre but within the administrative boundary of the city. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suburb).  This edit has also had the unfortunate effect of it being described as 'Suburb of Oxfordshire, England' when using the Wikipedia search facility, which is non-sensical.

Kidlington is indeed a 'large village'.  Settlements of this size in England are normally administered as towns (in my opinion).  Kidlington has a parish council.  Part of the settlement is in another parish, with another parish council (Gosford and Water Eaton), and most of the residents would describe themselves as living in Kidlington.

Kidlington is separated from the city of Oxford by the Oxford green belt, and is therefore not a suburb (in my opinion).  I believe a better geographical term for the settlement is a 'dormitory of Oxford' (a term remembered from school geography), although there is also a fair amount of employment located in the north of the parish.

Please can this edit be reversed, or a citation provided? (I have been a Kidlington resident for 40 years.) 78.144.161.114 (talk) 10:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Its a village, already restored with relevant source. DragonofBatley (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Many thanks! 78.144.161.114 (talk) 23:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Apologies, thank you for bringing this up : ) Luna Char (talk) 20:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kidlington&oldid=1245086953"