Talk:Kiev Voivodeship

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Marcelus in topic Kiev Voivodeship or Kyiv Voivodeship

Speedy rename

edit

Are there any opposition to speedy rename this article, particularly to Kiev Voivodeship or Kiev Voivodship? M.K. 11:21, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think a proper RM would be in order.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  03:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why do we need to vote? Why can't we discuss and agree without the evil voting? WP:RM is the last, not the first resort. So, the current name is good because...? --Irpen 06:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Would like to know motives why this invented name is applied to this article, as such name is not present nor in Google books nor in scholar, only Kiev Voivodship? M.K. 11:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kijów is alien to English language literature, speedy move is obvious. M0RD00R 13:36, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, the Kiev is indeed better then Kijów in this context - article moved.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  02:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  02:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Could you say, why you changed your opinion so suddenly? M.K. 09:26, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Good question. Piotrus, why did you move it Kiev Voivodeship? In English the name Kiev appeared around 1800s. Voivodeship by that time was gone. In Google neither Kijow Voivodeship nor Kiev Voivodeship provide many hits, but actually the former is a bit more popular. --Greggerr (talk) 00:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kiev Voivodeship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kiev Voivodeship or Kyiv Voivodeship

edit

"Kiev Voivodeship" now archaic "Kyiv Voivodeship" should be used Ereglin (talk) 10:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Not in historical articles per Wikipedia consensus. Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
It should actually be "Kijów Voivodeship", per analogiam with Bracław Voivodeship, Bełz Voivodeship Marcelus (talk) 17:26, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply