This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Unfortunately, having given this a read, I think I will have to give this a WP:QUICKFAIL. This article is not currently illustrated with any images, and I think it is still too brief to really cover the necessary amount of detail for this to be considered a Good article. I highly recommend giving the Good article criteria a close read and try to expand this article further with illustrations and further information, and then submitting it again when it is further developed. For instance, this article does not provide any information about e.g. reception to the amendment, how it was negotiated, whether it has been successfully implemented etc. Feel free to ask for more information on my talk page. Arcahaeoindris (talk) 16:11, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply