Talk:Kiix-in
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Possible move to "Keeshan"
editI know in BC Wikipedia we often stay with native spellings, e.g. Xa:ytem Rock, but wondering about this one; it's often (I think) linked as Keeshan....but the Nat'l Historic Site info uses the Nuu-cha-nulth "Kiix?in". Thoughts?Skookum1 (talk) 07:22, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Requested move 24 January 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move to Kiix-in, per consensus (non-admin closure). © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 23:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Kiix?in → Kiixʔin – “Kiixʔin” is the Nuu-chah-nulth spelling for the name (see Huuayaht.org or Kiixʔin on Google) using the Nuu-chah-nulth alphabet [1] with the letter ʔ instead of the question mark. The letter ʔ happens to be in MediaWiki:Titleblacklist, so I cannot do the renaming myself. Moyogo/ (talk) 11:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Move to Kiix-in per this. This seems to be the way it's usually rendered when writing in English. Wikipedia titles shouldn't use non-standard characters when alternatives are available.--Cúchullain t/c 16:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Move to Kiix-in per Cúchullain and WP:COMMONNAME. Jenks24 (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Move to Kiix-in per Cúchullain and WP:COMMONNAME. Tiggerjay (talk) 17:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.