Talk:Kildeer, Illinois
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kildeer, Illinois. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Sewage facilities
editDo we need so many paragraphs devoted to a sewage upgrade in the 1970's? There are other topics worthy of discussion, such as the new retail areas, I think this could be reduced to a single paragraph, I'm sure the references can be used for somebody who might somehow be actually interested in the full story. Nerfer (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- The more I read this, the more I see that this whole history section needs a major revamp. Large sections of prose without a single reference, about detailed events from 1958 to 1979. It's too detailed and not written in a style befitting an encyclopedia. Meanwhile, there is nothing about changes occurring in this century. But the task is too big for me right now. Nerfer (talk) 16:04, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- I agree - any editor could delete all the history section, as it is unsourced. Way too much about the Brickman confrontation, and it is written in the style of a newspaper account rather than encyclopedia.Parkwells (talk) 14:01, 30 November 2017 (UTC)