| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Content From Subject or Partisan
editSignificant portions of the article speak directly to concerns intimate or of merit only to the personality subject of the article- what Kim-Joy was considering to study, the name of her cats, partner, etc. The tone, focus, and scale of elements should be edited for encyclopedic character. Mavigogun (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
reversion
editNot sure why sections were removed and card game was added to a renamed 'bibliography' section. It's not a book, and it's not by her. Valereee (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oh... My mistake. I realize that when I just now read the article. George Ho (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
surname
editapparently she avoided using her father's surname, and I'm not sure we can argue she was notable under it. I kind of feel like we don't need it in the lead? Valereee (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Joint second or runner-up?
editWhy should she be considered "joint second" rather than "runner-up"? I'm uncertain whether she should be considered "joint second". She's always a runner-up as said in the season page. All others considered "joint second" are also "runners-up". George Ho (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- @George Ho, I think it may be a BrEng thing? Valereee (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Too many details?
editI can't help wonder whether the article currently has too many details that would interest niche, i.e. specific, audience. I don't know how and why critics' opinions improve readers' understanding of this person. Maybe readers are unable to taste her bakes or something? George Ho (talk) 06:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Critic's opinions of her work are important to readers' understanding of how her work was received. Valereee (talk) 21:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)