Talk:Kim Ji-woong (entertainer)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Requested move 18 October 2024
edit
 | It has been proposed in this section that Kim Ji-woong (entertainer) be renamed and moved to Kim Ji-woong. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Kim Ji-woong (entertainer) → Kim Ji-woong – Proposing Kim Ji-woong (entertainer) be moved to Kim Ji-woong usurping the disambiguation.
Guidelines indicate that these two articles should be disambiguated with a hatnote rather than a standalone disambiguation page per WP:ONEOTHER.
Over the last year, entertainer has received 470x more average daily pageviews than Kim Ji-woong (footballer) so clear primary topic (WP:PT1), and clickstream shows almost all traffic to Kim Ji-woong proceeds to entertainer. Footballer is a 6 word stub with no citations that could probably be brought to AfD. RachelTensions (talk) 01:57, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination, paired with Kim Ji-woong → deleted to make room for move. The entertainer has an article with 32 inline cites, while the entry for Kim Ji-woong (footballer) is an uncited six-word stub. A hatnote atop the entertainer's entry would indeed suffice. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support: as per above. 𝙹𝚒𝚢𝚊𝚗 忌炎 (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔) 05:02, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. SnowKang (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)