This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In the opinion of this editor, the work section of this article has a non-neutral point of view that is overly favourable to the subject. This section consists primarily of primary sources that have been written by the subject and published in a scientific journal, leading to the section focusing primarily on his works, without the presence of other academic papers or secondary sources that would likely offer a different and more complete perspective of the relevance of the subjects contributions. Although there is an attempt to try to explain the relevance of his work, it lacks any sources and partially consists of puffery. As such, this section needs a rewrite by someone familiar with the subject to create a neutral point of view. --FactualCollector7d1 (talk) 19:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
