Talk:Kimberley, British Columbia

Untitled

Article needs additional information. Is the mayor deceased? --BoomerAB (talk) 16:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Population

Where do you get the population number from? The official page of the town of Kimberley (see http://kimberley.iwebez.com/siteengine/activepage.asp?PageID=304) lists the population at 6139, citing the 2006 census as a source. So either the official page is outdated (which is quite possible), the number on Wikipedia is wrong, or the population has increased by 1/7th in 1 year. Which one is it and what is the correct population number? 132.230.86.103 (talk) 13:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kimberley, British Columbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140713004716/http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/infra/library/Name%20Incorp%202011.xls to http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/infra/library/Name%20Incorp%202011.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

"A good place to be" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect A good place to be has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 23 § A good place to be until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)