Talk:Kina (animal)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum caution and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform the project members on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 07:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Picture

The picture half way down with the caption 'Medium size Evechinus chloroticus from Whangaparaoa Peninsula, New Zealand', I'm wondering if there's a ref for 'medium sized' there, as it looks much smaller than usual to me. Unless that's a giant's hand...Number36 (talk) 23:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed name change

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

---

New Zealand sea urchin → Kina (animal) – 23:08, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Any reason this shouldn't be at Kina? Or perhaps, as that's a disambig page, Kina (New Zealand Sea Urchin), Kina (animal), or something similar. They're pretty much exclusively known as Kina within New Zealand, not only in Maori, but also their common name in English as adopted from the Maori language. I mean we know they're called Sea Urchins overseas, but it's certainly not common to refer to them as such. A couple of refs; the page from the Seafood Industry Council on them; here, and an article from The Southland times here.Number36 (talk) 00:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

I agree. This is the name by which it is universally known in New Zealand (outside of Marine biology). Stuartyeates (talk) 03:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

There is a preference (I think) to use binomial names for organisms since they are a unique identifier. In this case the binomial name is Evechinus chloroticus. It is currently a redirect. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

I think WP:COMMONNAME means that the common name rather than scientific should be used as the article title; the most relevant common name in this case appears to be Kina.Number36 (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

• Support per WP:COMMONNAME. I agree that when an overwhelming common name exists, we should use it and not the scientific bionomial name. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:24, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.