 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rewrite
editThis article is apalling. It is both incomprehensible and almost totally devoid of information. Would anyone else support the idea of a complete rewrite? Please respond. Bosola 17:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Apparently the article has been rewritten, but now it consists mostly of a huge regimental unit list which is ugly and probably unnecessary. Is there somewhere we can link to so we could cut it out? --Lendorien 22:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Cut out the unit list. Still needs sourcing. --Lendorien 14:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Apparently the article has been rewritten, but now it consists mostly of a huge regimental unit list which is ugly and probably unnecessary. Is there somewhere we can link to so we could cut it out? --Lendorien 22:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Merge
editArticle is a stub and an unsourced orphan and falls under the scope of the article Thai Royal Army. I sugegst this article be merged into it. --Lendorien 15:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
The RGR does not belong to the RTA.--98.111.139.133 (talk) 01:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- The recent addition of notable units reminded me that the RTG, as we called it, was hired to defend the perimeter of U-Tapao Royal Thai Navy Airfield, or RTNAFB, as we called it, during the Vietnam War. We were told the RTG was most emphatically not regular army, but more like mercenaries, and that they belonged to the Prince. --Pawyilee (talk) 10:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)