Talk:King Edward VII Academy

Latest comment: 4 years ago by ClemRutter

Comment

edit

The school does not offer much. The school holds a lot of information back, with many unprofessional staff managing to produce some successful students (due to the catchment area producing many already bright kids) which they use as stats for their rep. The kids who don't do so well tend to be ignored by staff and are assumed as lost causes. The heads of some past year groups tend to be rude, stereotypical and over-powered. The head seems to be absent from staff/students problems- infact many may ask what his role is.. other than to promote a false reputation. (Magicstarfish89 (talk) 04:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC))Reply

Reorganisation March 2009

edit

I've tried to make a start building a better lead and sticking more with WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI. Needs third party references really and a history section certainly seems appropriate -- Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King Edward VII Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply