Talk:King Manor

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King Manor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605235300/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1467&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1467&ResourceType=Building

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King Manor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080906164720/http://www.charityadvantage.com/kingmanor/rufus.asp to http://www.charityadvantage.com/kingmanor/rufus.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Commons coordinates

User:Pi bot, which has been tagging the coordinates for a lot of commons categories made a mistake with this one. The house is located on Jamaica Avenue between 150th Street and 153rd Street, but the bot tagged it as being on the Jackie Robinson Parkway at the westbound on-ramp from the Myrtle Avenue / Union Turnpike interchange. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 05:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

UPDATE -- I undid the bot's edit yesterday. I wish I could've corrected the location from there. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 13:49, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst talk 20:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

King Manor

• ... that a radio host got a free apartment in New York City's King Manor and lived there for over three decades? Source: Ferris, Marc (March 6, 1998). "Feeling At Home With Manor's History". Newsday. p. A35; Chen, Stefanos (June 5, 2020). "Quarantined in a Museum". The New York Times.
  • ALT1: ... that a radio host lived in New York City's King Manor for three decades after learning about it from his wife's supervisor? Source: Ferris, Marc (March 6, 1998). "Feeling At Home With Manor's History". Newsday. p. A35; Chen, Stefanos (June 5, 2020). "Quarantined in a Museum". The New York Times.
  • ALT2: ... that when a children's shelter was proposed in New York City's King Manor, civic groups called the plan a "menace"? Source: "Vigorous Opposition to King Manor Invasion". The Standard Union. May 15, 1921. p. 19
  • ALT3: ... that U.S. Founding Father Rufus King moved to New York City's King Manor because he wanted to move to the countryside? Source: King, Charles (1854). "Rufus King". Homes of American Statesmen: with anecdotical, personal, and descriptive sketches, by various writers. Illustrated with engravings, etc. G. P. Putnam & Company. pp. 357-358.
  • ALT4: ... that the oldest part of New York City's King Manor may be its annex? Source: Grossman, Joel W. (March 5, 1991). Archaeological Tests and Artifact Analysis Results from Rufus King Park, Jamaica, Queens, New York (PDF) (Report). Land-Site Contracting Corp. p. 6
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Genghis Khan
  • Comment: I can provide more hooks if necessary.

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/King Manor; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Morogris (✉ • ✎) 17:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC) All hooks check out, but the original hook is my favorite. Article is new/long enough, is of great quality (I would say GA quality already, if not a good candidate for FA). There are no copyright violations. I spot checked several sources other than the hook and attribution is done correctly. Image has appropriate licenses. QPQ is done. There are no tags in the article and everything is sourced correctly. Your articles are an inspiration for my work on US landmarks - thanks for all you do! Morogris (✉ • ✎) 17:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:King Manor/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 01:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 20:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

This nomination has been collecting dust for long enough. Here's my effort on reviewing it. Reconrabbit 20:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Pretty sure I'm done reviewing here. There are a couple notes on whether details should be included or excluded but I think those are coming down to personal opinion. If it was a major concern I'd ask on WP NYC or somewhere similar. Reconrabbit 13:52, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Lead

• Summarizes all major points of the article. Y

Prose notes

Site

• All good. Doesn't look like there are any obvious historical records of specific native groups in the Jamaica region that the land was bought from to go into further detail. Y

Use as residence

• King erected the eastern portion of the main house.[19][52][60] The interiors were redesigned in the Federal and Georgian styles. These statements seem awkward just standing on their own. If combined (along with the following sentence about the 1910 expansion) they may flow better and make it more obvious that the eastern addition was prior to or during 1910 (though sources are vague about the exact year it was built, only that King built it).
  • I've combined the second sentence with the sentence after it. Epicgenius (talk) 00:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Use as park and museum

• 1900s: Is it worthwhile to specifically distinguish between the KMA having been "formed" and having elections by February 1900, but only being "incorporated" in December? It clarifies itself by reading to the end, but the first paragraph makes it a little unclear.
  • I've reworded this so it's more clear that the KMA received its certificate of incorporation in December 1900. Epicgenius (talk) 00:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
• 1930s to 1970s: how relevant is it to the history of the place that there were drug addicts in King Park as reported only by the New York Daily News? Is it related to the parks enforcement patrol station later on?
  • It might be. I don't know if Long Island newspapers also reported on this story, though; if not, this detail might be too minor to include, anyway. Epicgenius (talk) 00:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Architecture

• Noting that The rooms included imported marble fireplace mantels is strange when the mantels are described in detail later on; is the Interior heading meant to signify a summary of the following floors?
  • As to is the Interior heading meant to signify a summary of the following floors?, yes. Epicgenius (talk) 00:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
    • No notes on this section, then. Y

Operation

• Made a minor edit to link Sampler (needlework) and make the plurality of exhibits consistent (?). Otherwise Y

Impact

• "the adjacent Jamaica Avenue elevated Elevated as a shorthand for "elevated railway" is a little confusing since it isn't used anywhere previously in the article.
  • I have rephrased this. Epicgenius (talk) 00:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Neutrality

• Very little if any vandalism. No edit wars as I can see. Stable, main changes in the months since nomination have been copy-edits. Y

Broad / narrowness

References

• Multiref (unbulleted list citebundle) is used inconsistently in places. E.g., it's used for [80] but not [244].
  • Good point. I've consistently formatted all refs where multiple citations were used. Epicgenius (talk) 23:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Source checks

Based on this revision:

• [5] Y
• [13] Y
• [18] Y
• [19] Y
• [22] Y
• [34] Y
• [37] Y
• [42] Y
• [51] Y but is it typical to use "said" for [Charles King's] written statements? May be preference, I don't know. I might have missed if the book was dictated.
  • I don't think the book was dictated, but I sometimes use "said" synonymously with "stated". I'm going to change it to "wrote" to clear things up. Epicgenius (talk) 16:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
• [52] Y
• [60] Y
• [69] Y
• [74] Y
• [83] Y
• [91] Y
• [104] Y
• [112] Y Great quote.
• [120] Y
• [132] Y
• [146] Y
• [153] Y
• [166] Y
• [174] Y
• [189] Y
• [212] Y
• [224] Y It might be worthwhile to add the context from the article that efforts from the Dept. of Parks and Recreation led to the relocation of a soccer league from the park to York College but I could see that being considered undue weight on marginal details.
• [235] Y
• [236] Y
• [239] Y
• [254] Y
• [284] Y
• [295] Y

Copyright/OR

• Very low % score on Earwig. I can't check the Google results but I'll trust what Morogris said on the DYK nomination.

Images

• Images have appropriate use rationales/are all under appropriate licenses. Most are "own work". They are also placed in places where it makes sense. I would say that the article could do with more images of the interior, but it's certainly not within the scope of this review and one can paint a picture with words here. It's not the most unique house in New York.
  • Yeah... sadly I didn't have the opportunity to photograph the house back when I was in the area last year. I might not be able to drop by for a while, anyway, due to how busy I am in real life. Epicgenius (talk) 23:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
    • A concern for higher-level scrutiny for sure. It's good to know what it looks like from the outside and inside on a base level, and we have that. Reconrabbit 00:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
• The caption of the first image under section "Architecture" could use a better caption than "Rufus King home". It's also got a "Rufus King Jamaica Ave" watermark on it?
  • I've changed the caption and might crop out the watermark later. Epicgenius (talk) 23:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
• Some of these images are also uploaded by "King Manor Association". Good on them if it's the real association putting up these freely usable photos but it would be nice to confirm if that's accurate. Not necessary at all of course, assuming people (organizations) are who they say they are.

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.