Talk:Kingdom of Dalmatia

Nationalist POV...

Sry, but that is just plain incorrect. Dalmatia was de jure purchased from the Kingdom of Hungary by the Venetian Republic in the Middle ages, and while we may debate the legality of that medieval purchase, by 1797 there was no dispute as to who held de jure (and de facto) rights on Dalmatia. The Austrian Empire annexed the entire territory of the former Venetian Republic from the French Empire in 1814, placing itself under no legal obligation whatsoever towards its own tiny subdivision, the Kingdom of Croatia. To suggest that something of the sort took place is ludicrous. These are all the most basic historical facts. Your source is blatantly in contradiction with them. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 20:14, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Triune Kingdom of Dalmatia, Croatia and Slavonia is a historical name. Dalmatia was in Austrian part of Dual Monarchy.--Ex13 (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, thank you, its a name. A name of a state. Its a historic state, so yes its a historic name as well. And yes I have noticed by now that Dalmatia was in the Austrian part of the dual monarchy which was established in 1866. Much obliged. Now please respond to my post.

Kindly stop edit warring to push your complete and utter nonsense into this article. I'm getting tired of having to revert your constant stream of nationalist POV every hour.

Actually, the Dual Monarchy was established in 1867 :)

Also, you didnt read the source. You just talk about POV pushing, nationalist, etc. but but your claims are not confirmed with a singl source. I'm tired to explain to you the history. I don't like your POV pushing.--Ex13 (talk) 20:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

The composition of the two subdivisions was agreed-upon in 1866, I know what I'm talking about. Quote minig for some silly out-of-context sentence that "expands the borders" of Croatia is the definition of nationalist POV. The reason I'm frustrated with you is that you have no Wiki manners. You just waltz in and make your edit, when someone expresses his concerns you simply revert and make incomplete responses.

I will repeat: Venice bought Dalmatia from Hungary; Venice was annexed by France; Venice was taken from France by Austria. I'm not seeing any "Triune Kingdoms" in the line of succession here. Please explain this POV. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 21:19, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, i explained with the source. As i said many times, you are POV pusher. You are talking about the history without providing any source. You said that the term "Triune kingdom of Dalmatia, Croatia, and Slavonia" exist, but you are deleting it from the article. -Ex13 (talk) 08:02, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

It˙s a tragicomedy when Serbs try to prsent Croatia as not existing under Hasburgs while ignring the fact that Serbia DID no exist under the Ottomans. They put Serbian name on Montenegro rulers but there are none in real historic sources.

Official language

There were no official languages. In government Italian was spoken for well into the 1870s, but it had no official status. In censuses the language spoken by Croats and Serbs was called "Croatian or Serbian". No "Croatian language" anywhere. Also, if you're not aware, Croatian is a variant of Serbo-Croatian anyway, so... -- Director (talk) 00:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Stop lying piece of Serbian shit. Ortodox people in Dalmatia became Serbs only after they got under jurisdiction of Serbian ortodox churh. Croats (whatever dialect they spoke), called they language only "Croatian". Yugoslavia is dead and you have no right to push it`s dead ideas.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kingdom of Dalmatia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130529164005/http://www.omm1910.hu/?%2Fde%2Fdatenbank to http://www.omm1910.hu/?%2Fde%2Fdatenbank

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:39, 10 December 2017 (UTC)