Talk:Kingsbury, Warwickshire

Third opinion

Background

Information has been added recently about the threat of closure to the village's school swimming pool.[1] I removed this as I didn't feel it was relevant to this particular article and the external link provided was problematic. But I added the information to the page related to Kingsbury School. [2] The information has since been readded a couple of times, [3] [4] and I have advised the editor that Wikipedia probably isn't the place for this sort of thing [5] I'm requesting a third opinion as I'd like someone else to look at the article and offer some advice on this issue. Thanks TheRetroGuy (talk) 19:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Third opinion: It's entirely irrelevant and wholly uneeded in the article. This isn't a soapbox or a place to promote your cause. Take it elsewhere. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:34, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Village or town?

The sentence which says Kingsbury is "frequently referred to as a small town rather than a village" needs a source. From personal experience I lived in Kingsbury for fifteen years and it was always known as a village so I'm a bit sceptical. TheRetroGuy (talk) 12:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kingsbury, Warwickshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070606085403/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/robert.haines7/khs/index.html to http://homepage.ntlworld.com/robert.haines7/khs/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)