Talk:Kingsnorth power station

Future power plant tag

That is one ugly tag. There is nothing speculative in those three sentences. When can I remove it?- Crosbiesmith (talk) 21:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Critics of Greenpeace?

Should that sentence be in there at all? It's not to do with Kingsnorth specifically, and saying Gas is a move towards a low-carbon economy doesn't really make sense. I've been bold and removed it, but feel free to correct me.--PhilMacD (talk) 17:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Criticism from Greenpeace

Whilst Greenpeace may have made stated their argument, should it be repeated her unless either their facts can be verified or unless there is space for a counter argument. Can there case be verified or should it be deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.247.179 (talk) 14:21, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

The Greenpeace is case is a matter of their own opinion. The only question is notability. If the opinions of Greenpeace are noteworthy, it should stay. If they are irrelevant, it should go. Whether Greenpeace are correct or not is beside the point. Indeed, if their argument was verifiable, we would not bother attributing such views to Greenpeace. We would simply state them as a fact.

I will go on to say that the contributions regarding the effect of the Large Plant Combustion Directive added by the poster, at 79.68.247.179, probably constitute orginal research, see Wikipedia:No original research. The claim that the directive 'will result in the closure of 12.7GW of coal and oil power stations by 2015' constitues 'unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position'. Again, whether it is correct or incorrect is beside the point. - Crosbiesmith (talk) 14:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. Taking your comment on original research, how about this for a link on the LCPD http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file41999.pdf - it list the plants to go and their sizes in table 4.1.

Planned power station template

Does anyone object to the removal of the planned power station template? It is unsightly. - Crosbiesmith (talk) 08:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

I'd say keep it, it is true, and maybe useful for drawing attention to the fact? But if you feel strongly about it, don't let me stop you!--PhilMacD (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

---

Kingsnorth Power Station → Kingsnorth power station — Just for capitalisation purposes, per a discussion at Talk:Stella power stations#So what was the right name? some time ago..--Fintan264 (talk) 20:06, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kingsnorth power station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080609174939/http://royalsociety.org/downloaddoc.asp?id=5183 to http://royalsociety.org/downloaddoc.asp?id=5183
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090625181056/http://www.telegraph.co.uk:80/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5596190/Protesters-arrested-for-challenging-police-officers-without-badge-numbers-lodge-formal-complaint.html to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5596190/Protesters-arrested-for-challenging-police-officers-without-badge-numbers-lodge-formal-complaint.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:58, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kingsnorth power station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080510120236/http://www.christianaid.org.uk/stoppoverty/climatechange/stories/Take_action_on_Kingsnorth.aspx to http://www.christianaid.org.uk/stoppoverty/climatechange/stories/Take_action_on_Kingsnorth.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kingsnorth power station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080924191646/http://nds.coi.gov.uk:80/environment/fullDetail.asp?ReleaseID=372398&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=True to http://nds.coi.gov.uk/environment/fullDetail.asp?ReleaseID=372398&NewsAreaID=2&NavigatedFromDepartment=True

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kingsnorth power station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080408100815/http://pressreleases.eon-uk.com/blogs/eonukpressreleases/archive/2008/03/31/E.ON-enters-UK-Government_2700_s-Carbon-Capture-and-Storage-competition.aspx to http://pressreleases.eon-uk.com/blogs//eonukpressreleases/archive/2008/03/31/E.ON-enters-UK-Government_2700_s-Carbon-Capture-and-Storage-competition.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080223104304/http://www.wdm.org.uk/kingsnorth/ to http://www.wdm.org.uk/kingsnorth/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 10 December 2017 (UTC)