Talk:Kingston Flyer

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in New Zealand Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	June 12, 2011

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Zealand Railways.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Merge in Kingston Flyer (train)

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Time to close this. Merged as per consensus below. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

These two articles discuss each other as they seem to be essentially the same train running in different era's. The more modern is named after the older. I propose merging them together. Jeepday (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree. It's a service that essentially evolved into a tourist service. There does not need to be two separate confusingly named pages about this. Ka ro ra 11:10, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic