Talk:Kingsway (Vancouver)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
editIs it truly named for Kingsway in London? Locally, I've been told that it is named for King Edward VII. Fishhead64 19:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Definitely possible since King Edward died in 1910, 3 years before Westminster Road (also Vancouver Road) was renamed to Kingsway. Another possibility is that King George V visited Vancouver in 1901 with his wife when he was the Duke of Cornwall. --Usgnus 20:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
The name "Kingsway" seems incomplete. Is it a road, street, avenue, boulevard, drive, lane, parkway, or some other type of route? If it is a way (the name being a contraction of "King's Way"), shouldn't it usually be preceded by the word "the", just like the Queensway, the Queen Elizabeth Way (a.k.a. the QEW) or the Gardiner Expressway? How do people in Burnaby typically refer to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.130.182 (talk) 05:29, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- It's "Kingsway," period. This is verified by the street signs and by maps. In this way it is analogous to Broadway, no definite article required. Lots of thoroughfares in British Columbia are designated _______ Way. The definite article makes no more sense here than it would with _______ Road. fishhead64 (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Picture at Dumfries
editThe Dumfries-area picture seems of low quality. Can a better one be added? If not, I propose it be removed. Thoughts? Thanks, Hu Gadarn 20:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kingsway (Vancouver). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130411131300/http://www.vancouverreview.com/past_articles/lostcities.htm to http://www.vancouverreview.com/past_articles/lostcities.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202142127/http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/publications/Circulars/All/G_Circ/1968/g20-68.pdf to http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/publications/Circulars/All/G_Circ/1968/g20-68.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202142129/http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/publications/Circulars/All/G_Circ/1971/g16-71.pdf to http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/publications/Circulars/All/G_Circ/1971/g16-71.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202142124/http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/publications/Circulars/All/G_Circ/1972/g22-72.pdf to http://www.th.gov.bc.ca/publications/Circulars/All/G_Circ/1972/g22-72.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)