Talk:Kingsway Business Park tram stop

Move to Kingsway Metrolink station?

I've noticed that the official maps and website are now referring to this stop as simply Kingsway. I think this page should be moved to reflect this. Andrew (talk) 12:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

This sort of thing has happened with other Metrolink stops, see for example Talk:Chorlton High Metrolink station and Talk:Chorlton Metrolink station. As I recall from discussions elsewhere, the opinion was that they might change their mind again, so we should not move the page until the stop actually opens, at which point we'll be certain what the name is. What we don't want to happen is the creation of two parallel articles in violation of WP:CUTPASTE; I think that there are still some between Victoria and Oldham Mumps where a history merge is still needed.

I notice that a redirect already exists from Kingsway Metrolink station, so when the station opens we can WP:MOVE the page over the top of that - or not, as the case may be. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

If you zoom in to the infobox picture, you'll notice that the station is (or at least was) called Kingsway Business Park. I wonder if they've changed that since? But this move seems to be correct - as per [1] & [2]. If they're using both forms then this move would probably still be the common name and looks a little slicker anyway, and can always use the full(?) name in the article. --Jza84 |  Talk  15:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

I only noticed this when they published the new map when the East Manchester line opened. Since this station is opening next week, it's pretty safe to assume that this name is final. It wouldn't take much for Metrolink to peel the Business Park lettering off the signs, would it? Andrew (talk) 16:19, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Is it Kingsway or KBP? Crookesmoor (talk) 09:48, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

It's KBP - I've just been on the system and the stop itself. It's announced as KBP, and signposted KBP. Metrolink.co.uk has it as KBP, with the exception of its map (possibly for cosmetic reasons). I think it needs moving back to KBP. --Jza84 |  Talk  14:57, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kingsway Business Park tram stop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120316000118/http://www.tfgm.com/2009_news.cfm?news_id=9007186%3Fsubmenuheader%3D3 to http://www.tfgm.com/2009_news.cfm?news_id=9007186%3Fsubmenuheader%3D3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kingsway Business Park tram stop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130523001932/http://www.tfgm.com/Corporate/media_centre/Pages/News.aspx?articleId=175 to http://www.tfgm.com/Corporate/media_centre/Pages/News.aspx?articleId=175

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)