Talk:Kinue Hitomi

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

SUGGESTION

edit
Hello! I'm editing this article "Kinuye Hitomi" as ja:人見絹枝 in Japanese Wikipedia.
I would suggest this article move from "Kinuye Hitomi" to "Kinue Hitomi".
The reason this has some version in other languages as de:Kinue Hitomi and et:Kinue Hitomi . Secondly now Google hits "Kinuye Hitomi" about 350 websites but "Kinue Hitomi" about 3000 websites.
For the present I edit this article as it is but no opinion shows this page by the end of Oct.2006, I will officially request to move as above. Thanks.--Mahopa 19:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
This article was moved to "Kinue Hitomi" in 1st Nov.2006.--Mahopa 21:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kinue Hitomi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply