Talk:Kirkbride Plan/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tom (LT) (talk · contribs) 06:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

I will take up this review. Give me a few days to familiarise myself with the subject and then I will post my review. --Tom (LT) (talk) 06:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Assessment

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Nil issues identified
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Discussion

• Fantastic and well-written article. Fascinating subject matter to boot. Will verify some references and do a copyright check within the next 1-2 days, but no other issues identified. --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:42, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Sorry about the delay. One issue: "The Northampton State Hospital in Northampton, Massachusetts, was also demolished the following year" was demolished in 2016, not 2017 as implied by the intervening sentence. No other issues identified during reference check. Have a wonderful holiday season, --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)