Talk:Kirkleatham
 | A fact from Kirkleatham appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 August 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Population
editWhilst I agree that including a population figure is desirable, this number is misleading. For a start there are only a couple of dozen dwellings in the village so 7,045 wildly over-estimates the actual inhabitants. Secondly, this electoral ward is part of Redcar and is included in the population figure on that page. Thirdly, the village of Kirkleatham is not actually in Kirkleatham ward - it's in Dormanstown ward, so residents would be included in Dormanstown's figure! I therefore propose to remove the statistic completely. Skrcppr (talk) 02:06, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kirkleatham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100721000007/http://www.apollo-magazine.com/march-2006/80236/assetstripping.thtml to http://www.apollo-magazine.com/march-2006/80236/assetstripping.thtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kirkleatham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10441705 - Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10108846 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111105203740/http://redcar-cleveland.gov.uk/rcbcmuseums.nsf/Web?ReadForm&id=F1365DBB7CFCC2EA80257816003F0EFA to http://www.redcar-cleveland.gov.uk/rcbcmuseums.nsf/Web?ReadForm&id=F1365DBB7CFCC2EA80257816003F0EFA
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)