 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:KissKissDahl.jpg
edit
Image:KissKissDahl.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
#c-BetacommandBot-2008-01-02T19:45:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:KissKissDahl.jpg){kind=link}
Merge
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was keep. Each of the short stories in this book are notable by themselves and mold into a structure already formed around the book article. Allowing them to have their own article also helps to add depth about each of the short stories. ComfyKem (talk) 03:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
I have placed merge (here) tags on the stories in this book, most are unreferenced and may have issues meeting WP:N as stand alone articles. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:35, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- I am against merging as there are such a lot of stand alone articles of this kind, and the stories are worth describing this way. The Wiki ghost (talk) 10:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- I oppose this too as these stories are quite separate and distinct. Warden (talk) 16:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose If you merge them, then the Template:Kiss Kiss stories will be useless, and they are completely different things (a book and a short story).Timothy Gu (talk) 01:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's in my understanding that most of these short stories were published as separate writings and then compiled together to form this book. Kind of like the Bible. Since consensus thus far is opposition to merger, I'll archive this discussion and remove merger tags. ComfyKem (talk) 03:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)