Talk:Kiss You (One Direction song)
Kiss You (One Direction song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 27, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kiss You (One Direction song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Kiss You (One Direction song). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Kiss You (One Direction song) at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from Kiss You (One Direction song) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 January 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Tempo
edit"The track has a tempo of 90 beats per minute with double-time verses". Really? I hear it as 180 bpm with choruses in half-time, which sounds to me like a clear dubstep influence. I know about NOR, so has any published source noticed this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.141.102.54 (talk) 00:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- My Cubase works perfectly with 88bpm with the metronom and antying. Anybody to verify this trough a valid referece? I personally really checked that 90 bpm is incorrect, but I don't hav a referece or proof for that. All the poor children that want to cover it :D 92.50.125.126 (talk) 00:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Music notes.com is the only source I can find for such information. Robin (talk) 22:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Requested move 4 January 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure). sst✈ 08:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Kiss You (One Direction song) → Kiss You – The 1D song is three years old but still remains a well-known song as it was a major chart success. The iiO song was barely notable to begin with and, having checked the page view statistics, I found that it has been viewed less than 160 times in the last two months. Unreal7 (talk) 15:31, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose WP:NCM, and there are other topics on Kiss You. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. per WP:NCM and Kiss You (iiO song). It might be noted that a) the Tony Bennett song of the same name was #1 for 10 weeks in 1951 and his first hit so probably would be primary topic if songs were sorted by beauty pageant methods. b) the 1D song has been at this namespace for the past 3 years without harming the universe or Wikipedia, and c) the page view statistics will drop considerably now there is no 1D. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Kiss You (One Direction song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121115073745/http://www.4music.com/news/news/6834/Review-One-Direction-Take-Me-Home to http://www.4music.com/news/news/6834/Review-One-Direction-Take-Me-Home
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924151304/http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?artist=One_Direction to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?artist=One_Direction
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.musicaedischi.it/mdonline_login_classifiche.php?ref=%2Fclassifiche.php
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/charts/internationalcharts/mexico
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://monitorlatino.com.mx/ChartsRD.aspx?f=3
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121219094524/http://www.gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/online/download/list.gaon to http://gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/online/download/list.gaon
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140715102748/http://media.wix.com/ugd/ff1e07_13cc06642b654b95979ea5d7fb76d27a.pdf to http://media.wix.com/ugd/ff1e07_13cc06642b654b95979ea5d7fb76d27a.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141221142847/http://www.radioairplay.fm/RadioDate/PublicDetails/477/ to http://www.radioairplay.fm/RadioDate/PublicDetails/477
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)