This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Comment of this major contributor: I added mostly references to the statements in this article, included also a remark about challenges that the technology is facing and improved the language. I would assume that all these contributions add to the quality of the article? E.g. the lacking secondary references were a point of criticism. Let me know please how to best address this. I do understand the COI issue but scientific quality is also an important goal. If someone else is willing to do this, great!
Is the buzzword tag still relevant for this article? I can not find any words that would qualify as buzzwords, the tone of the article is quite technical and factual now, in my humble opinion. Could someone please have a look? Rschmehl (talk) 14:52, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply