Talk:Kiyo Takamine and Zatch Bell

Latest comment: 14 years ago by DragonZero in topic Regarding the spell translations....

Untitled

edit

I'm of the opinion that this (and other Gash/Zatch Bell character articles) should be split into two separate articles for each character. Having them together makes things a little more complicated than necessary. Danny Lilithborne 16:11, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Did Zatch burn Danny's book?

edit
  • This is a little tricky to answer, I suppose, since Danny's book was burned as a result of Zatch's actions, but I don't think so. He wasn't the direct cause of it (the book was inside a car which had a flaming tanker about to fall on it, and the contents of the tanker after Zatch blowing it up was what caused it). However, I'm not completely unsold on the idea, and would rather poll people before putting it back on the page. So? Danny Lilithborne 01:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Of Course Zatch Burned Danny's Book, Didnt you see the episode? But Danny Needed zatch to burn his book, so...............-Anyonumus II

The Blown Up Tanker was near the car, and besides, you dont need to always burn the book to send the mamodo back to the Mamodo world. So It Was Near the car and Danny was holding it. Surely an explosive blast Could set the book on fire and could have destroyed Danny. You Just Have To Think about it, Danny Boy.-Anyonumus II

New Spell

edit

I Just put in a spell that i saw in episode 98. (Dont Delete) it's offical name is unknown untill now. BABERUGA ZAKERUGA IS REAL! THERE EVEN A PICTURE! JUST CLICK THE TITLE!

The other spell is "bao Zakarga" its the "bao" spell with the dragon

Who's the main character?

edit

This article: Zatch Bell... is the main character and namesake of the series.

Zatch Bell: The main character, Kiyo Takamine...

Fair use rationale for Image:GashKiyomaro.jpg

edit
 

Image:GashKiyomaro.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Gashbell3.jpg

edit
 

Image:Gashbell3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

What became of the "king"?

edit

Merging

edit

Before merging, please discuss.DragonZero (talk) 03:51, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the spell translations....

edit

In the "Skills" section of the article, numerous translations of the names of spells whose names were never officially translated exist, such as "Bao Claw Diskurg" and "Master Jikerdor". Even if these are the correct translations of the Japanese characters, I'm unsure as to whether they should really be used or not, since they are in no way official. Should these spell names be edited out and replaced with the normal romanizations, i.e. "Baou Kurou Disugurugu"? I think they probably should, but I'd like some others' input on this. --LoganTheGeshrat (talk) 17:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orange (オレンジ, Orenji), sometimes the authors try to make it sound like English words and since there's no source they are trying/not trying to, it can really go both ways. I'm not sure where the translations come from but Kurou is often Claw from what I've seen. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 18:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've personally never seen these translations anywhere other than this wikipedia page. In every translation of ZB that I've seen, Kurou is Kurou. I get that it's likely that Kurou might have been intended by Raiku to mean claw, but there was never an official translation of the spell done by VIZ, so what I'm suggesting is that we just "play it safe" and write the Japanese versions.--LoganTheGeshrat (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Go for it. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 03:09, 14 August 2010 (UTC)Reply