Talk:Kizhi Pogost
 | A fact from Kizhi Pogost appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 June 2010, and was viewed approximately 4,600 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
" . . . historical site of 18th–19th century . . . "
editThe information in the article appears clearly to indicate that the historical significance of the site began (at least as far back as) in the 1600s, with the building of the wall and the first church. If I have misunderstood in regards to the establishment of the site as a pogost, I apologize for this error. In any case, the opening refers to the "historical site" whose date should not really be shown as a date range. Dr.Luke.sc (talk) 14:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kizhi Pogost. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090510075239/http://kizhi.karelia.ru/specialist/pub/library/kizhi_40/02_centr.htm to http://kizhi.karelia.ru/specialist/pub/library/kizhi_40/02_centr.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 11 December 2017 (UTC)