Untitled

edit

the purpose of this article seems to be to promote its subject rather than deliver neutral information about him. andy (talk) 22:18, 7 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's because it's lifted from the Jewish Encyclopedia, and while this is generally seen to be an acceptable way of peopling WP, the JE's style is very out of date now. Itsmejudith (talk)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

edit

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:24, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply