Talk:Klubrádió

[Untitled]

POV: Almost the whole article fails neutrality guidelines. One author has presented an opinionated and one-sided case that is biased against Klubrádió (including a description of 2011 bid process disputed by Human Rights Watch and the EU authorities). A second author has added a short section "Klub-rule" which is also one-sided in the opposite direction. Cartesian1 (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

The article is also inappropriately long (compare, e.g., to the article on Hungary's oldest national radio station, Radio Kossuth). I think an article similar in length and content to the German-language entry might be more appropriate; if it is longer, it should provide facts about the radio's programming structure and operations and a brief, neutral reference to the political controversy concerning its license, not a lengthy, heavily biased opinion piece focused almost exclusively on politics. This is Wikipedia, not the Readers' Comments section of Népszabadság or Magyar Nemzet. vttoth (talk) 18:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Klubradio logo.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)