Talk:Klutz

Latest comment: 17 years ago by 148.87.1.171 in topic Publisher name no coincidence

VfD Debate

edit

Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion Jun 23 to 29 2004, consensus was to keep. Discussion:

  • Dictdef. RickK 06:28, Jun 23, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep as this a fairly well used term, and I certain something more than a dictdef will come of it. Burgundavia 10:05, Jun 23, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, ditto. Hey, there's even a well-established series of how-to books entitled "Klutz Guides", starting with "Juggling for the Complete Klutz." Dpbsmith 12:42, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • I tried to rewrite it into a keepable stub. I think it can be expanded upon. Let's keep. blankfaze | •­• 17:26, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Important Yiddish contrib to English. jengod 22:09, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)

End discussion

2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message

edit

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 05:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

There is a term in Icelandic "klaufi" with the exact same meaning, it's probably a related word, should this be added?

Publisher name no coincidence

edit

I take issue with the sentence, John Cassidy has used the coincidence of the name of the publisher and the Yiddish word to exploit the title in some of his books, for instance Juggling for the Complete Klutz. I believe the name of the publisher arose from the title Juggling for the Complete Klutz, their first book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.1.171 (talk) 22:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply