Talk:Knickerbocker and Arnink Garages
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Knickerbocker and Arnink Garages appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 July 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Knickerbocker and Arnink Garages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927181537/http://www.oprhp.state.ny.us/hpimaging/hp_view.asp?GroupView=333 to http://www.oprhp.state.ny.us/hpimaging/hp_view.asp?GroupView=333
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:27, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
General copy edits needed
editWhile browsing today, I noticed the Building section of this article could use some copy editing to spruce it up. Nothing is glaringly incorrect; however, the text generates some confusion between the two companies mentioned. Otherwise, there are words used repeatedly (while, above, etc.) when another choice of phrase might add more clarity in several sentences. For now, I’ll leave this here and, if someone doesn’t beat me to it, I’ll come back to it later. HiTrish (talk) 00:05, 7 June 2020 (UTC)