Talk:Knowledge production modes

Mode 1

Mode 1 is a disambiguation page that has a link for mode 1 to this article. We should either make this an article on different 'modes' or create a separate mode 1 article. RJFJR (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Mode 4 knowledge production

The Evolving Modes of Knowledge Production

The concept of "knowledge production modes" has become a prominent framework in the sociology of science, tracing the transformation of how scientific knowledge is generated and mobilized over time.

Mode 1: Disciplinary and Academic The earliest conceptualization, referred to as Mode 1, represents the traditional, discipline-based, and academically-driven model of knowledge production. In this mode, research is primarily motivated by the pursuit of scientific knowledge alone, with little concern for the direct applicability of its findings. Mode 1 is founded on a conceptualization of science as separated into discrete disciplines, where researchers operate within the confines of their specialized fields [1].

Mode 2: Interdisciplinary and Context-Driven In the mid-20th century, a new form of knowledge production emerged, labeled as Mode 2. Described by scholars like Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, and others, Mode 2 is characterized by a more context-driven, problem-focused, and interdisciplinary approach [1,2]. In this model, multidisciplinary teams are brought together for short periods to work on specific real-world problems, with a greater emphasis on the applicability and societal relevance of the research.

Mode 3: Coexistence of Diverse Knowledge Modes Building on these foundations, Elias Carayannis and David Campbell introduced the concept of Mode 3 knowledge production in the 2000s. Mode 3 emphasizes the coexistence and co-development of diverse knowledge and innovation modes at the individual, organizational, and systemic levels [3,4]. This framework acknowledges the need for mutual interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary knowledge creation, fostering synergies between various actors and institutional structures.

Limitations of Previous Modes While each of these knowledge production modes offered valuable insights, they were also subject to criticism and limitations. Mode 1 was criticized for its rigid disciplinary boundaries and lack of real-world relevance, while Mode 2 was seen as overly focused on short-term, problem-solving oriented research, potentially neglecting fundamental, curiosity-driven inquiries. Mode 3, though more inclusive, was still constrained by the limited number of stakeholders and perspectives engaged in the knowledge co-creation process.

Mode 4: Collaborative, Transdisciplinary, and Values-Oriented In 2024, Congolese scholar Pitshou Moleka proposed a revolutionary new paradigm, known as Mode 4 knowledge production [5]. This transformative approach addresses the shortcomings of previous modes by embracing a truly collaborative, transdisciplinary, and values-oriented approach to research and innovation.

At the heart of Mode 4 is Moleka's groundbreaking "decuple helix" framework, which expands the scope of stakeholder engagement and knowledge co-creation to incorporate a comprehensive range of actors, from academia and industry to marginalized communities, the natural environment, and international organizations. This inclusive, holistic approach is essential for unlocking the transformative potential of collaborative research and innovation to tackle complex, interconnected societal challenges.

Mode 4 is characterized by a fundamental epistemological shift towards co-creation, an organizational transformation towards flexible, networked structures, and a methodological transformation towards iterative, adaptive, and design-oriented research processes. This paradigm shift represents a radical departure from traditional models, offering a new vision for the role of science and scholarship in building a more sustainable and equitable future [6].

References: 1. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (2010). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. SAGE Publications Ltd. 2. Gibbons, M., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. A. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. SAGE Publications. 3. Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2006). "'Mode 3': Meaning and implications from a knowledge systems perspective". In Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters: A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe, and Asia (pp. 1–25). Praeger Publishers. 4. Peris-Ortiz, M., Ferreira, J., Farinha, L., & Fernandes, N. (2016). "Introduction to Multiple Helix Ecosystems for Sustainable Competitiveness". In Multiple helix ecosystems for sustainable competitiveness (pp. 1–14). Springer. 5. Moleka, P. (2024). The Revolutionary Potential of Mode 4 Knowledge Production. 6. Moleka, P. (2024). Innovationology: A Goundbreaking Transdisciplinary Framework for Sustainable and Equitable Development in Africa. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review 7 (5), 178-193

Pitshoumol (talk) 05:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Innovationology

In the rapidly evolving landscape of knowledge production, a groundbreaking new field has emerged - Innovationology, pioneered by the visionary Congolese scholar Pitshou Moleka. Drawing on a rich tapestry of disciplines, from complexity theory and quantum physics to humanities, social sciences, and beyond, Innovationology represents a radical departure from traditional, siloed approaches to research and innovation [1].

At its core, Innovationology embraces a transdisciplinary ethos, recognizing that the most pressing challenges facing our world require the synthesis of diverse ways of knowing and modes of inquiry. Moleka's work is rooted in the understanding that complexity, non-linearity, and the interplay of multiple, interconnected systems lie at the heart of the human experience and the natural world. By bridging the divides between the natural sciences, social sciences, humanities, arts, and spiritual traditions, Innovationology offers a holistic framework for grappling with the wicked problems of our time [2].

Complexity Theory and the Quantum Paradigm At the foundational level, Innovationology draws heavily on the insights of complexity theory, which illuminates the dynamic, emergent, and unpredictable nature of social, ecological, and technological systems [3]. Moleka's work also incorporates the paradigm-shifting revelations of quantum physics, which have undermined the mechanistic, reductionist worldview that has long dominated Western scientific thought. By recognizing the paradoxical, interconnected, and probabilistic nature of reality, Innovationology challenges us to reconsider our most fundamental assumptions about the nature of knowledge and the human condition [4].

Embracing Diverse Epistemologies and Ontologies Rejecting the notion of a single, universal truth, Innovationology embraces a pluralistic approach that celebrates diverse ways of knowing and being. From the wisdom traditions of indigenous communities to the speculative visions of science fiction, from the embodied explorations of the arts to the liberatory praxis of decolonial and postcolonial movements, Innovationology seeks to integrate a wide array of epistemologies and ontologies [5,6]. By centering marginalized voices and non-Western perspectives, this transdisciplinary field challenges the hegemony of Eurocentric knowledge production and opens up new frontiers of understanding.

Collaborative Co-Creation and Adaptive Methodologies At the heart of Innovationology lies a commitment to collaborative co-creation, where researchers, practitioners, and diverse stakeholders come together to collectively define problems, generate knowledge, and co-design solutions. Moleka's work emphasizes the need for iterative, adaptive, and design-oriented research methodologies that can navigate the complexities of real-world contexts. Drawing inspiration from fields such as sustainability science, transition studies, and strategic niche management, Innovationology embraces a flexible, reflexive, and participatory approach to knowledge production [7,8].

Integrating the Humanities, Arts, and Spirituality Innovationology recognizes the vital role of the humanities, arts, and spiritual traditions in enriching our understanding of the human experience and catalyzing transformative change. By integrating insights from disciplines like literature, philosophy, anthropology, and the creative arts, Moleka's work explores the deeper cultural, ethical, and existential dimensions of societal challenges. Moreover, Innovationology considers the contributions of diverse spiritual and religious worldviews, acknowledging the profound influence of beliefs, values, and cosmologies on human behavior and socio-ecological systems [9].

Beyond Disciplinary Silos: Toward Transdisciplinary Synthesis Ultimately, Innovationology represents a bold step towards transcending the rigid boundaries of academic disciplines and professional specializations. By fostering deep, meaningful collaborations across diverse fields, Moleka's work aims to generate novel, integrative knowledge that can address the complex, interconnected crises facing our world. From climate change and environmental degradation to social inequalities and global health challenges, Innovationology offers a transformative framework for mobilizing collective intelligence and unlocking pathways to a more sustainable, equitable, and flourishing future [10,11].

Practical Applications and Systemic Transformation While Innovationology may be considered a radical departure from traditional research paradigms, Moleka's work has already begun to yield tangible results in a wide range of real-world contexts. From co-creating regenerative agroecological systems with indigenous communities to designing inclusive urban planning initiatives that integrate multiple stakeholder perspectives, Innovationology has demonstrated its potential to catalyze systemic change [12]. By fostering deep collaboration and cultivating a shared sense of purpose, this transdisciplinary field holds the promise of ushering in a new era of collective problem-solving and societal transformation.

Conclusion In an age of unprecedented complexity and global crises, Innovationology emerges as a bold and necessary response, challenging us to transcend the limitations of disciplinary silos and embrace a more holistic, collaborative, and values-oriented approach to knowledge production. Through its synthesis of diverse epistemologies, its commitment to participatory co-creation, and its integration of the humanities, arts, and spiritual dimensions, Innovationology offers a transformative vision for the role of research and innovation in shaping a more sustainable, equitable, and flourishing future for all [13].

References: [1] Moleka, P. (2024a). Innovationology: A Comprehensive, Transdisciplinary Framework for Driving Transformative Innovation in the 21st Century. [2] Moleka, P. (2024b). Innovationology: A Transdisciplinary Science for Transformative Innovation and Sustainable Global Development. [3] Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. Routledge. [4] Moleka, P. (2024c). Frugal Innovation for Inclusive and Sustainable Development in Africa. Advanced Research in Economics and Business Strategy Journal, 5(1), 107-117. [5] Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Duke University Press. [6] Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. Aunt Lute Books. [7] Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability science, 6(2), 203-218. [8] Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161-183. [9] Moleka, P. (2024d). Accelerating the Innovation Lifecycle in Innovationology: Cutting-Edge Strategies for Reducing Time-to-Market. [10] Moleka, P. (2024e). Holistic Education. Enhancing the Mind, Body and Soul. The Innovationology Series / TOME V. GRIN: Verlag. [11] Moleka, P. (2024f). Innovationology and the Geoeconomics of the BRICS. Towards a Sustainable and Equitable Global Order. The Innovationology Series / TOME VII. GRIN: Verlag. [12] Moleka, P. (2024g). Innovationology: A Groundbreaking Transdisciplinary Framework for Sustainable and Equitable Development in Africa. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review, 7(5), 178-193. [13] Moleka, P. (2024l). The Transformative Power of Innovationology. Pitshoumol (talk) 06:28, 1 November 2024 (UTC)