Talk:Knyvett v Christchurch Casinos Ltd
Latest comment: 9 years ago by EmadIV in topic Contested deletion
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I have cited in this very article proof of its relevance, a book that is widely used in NZ law schools. In light of this, I find it bizarre that it is not only tagged for deletion, but a speedy one at that. Has this member not got better things to do?
- Apologies, was a small mistake. Wasn't quite aware of what you had said. Cheers! →εϻαdιν ΤαΙk Ͼδητrιβμτιoης 16:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thanks for the apology...