Talk:Kobus!
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Speedy deletion
editI don't see any reason why this should qualify for speedy deletion. It consists of straightforward facts about the group, relevant dates and no promotional tone. I would really love an explanation should it be deleted, since I can't see it being irrelevant, or even as self-promotional as any of the other pages listed under K of South African musicians.
- Erm, did you read why it's nominated for speedy deletion? SuperDT 04:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- It was tagged as not asserting the significance of the subject. However, the article mentions a connection to Springbok Nude Girls, a very notable band. One of the inclusion criteria for music is "Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable", so this clearly qualifies under that criterion at least. I've removed the tag. 07:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Good enough for me. However, please find some sources to back this stuff up. Thanks. SuperDT 16:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- It was tagged as not asserting the significance of the subject. However, the article mentions a connection to Springbok Nude Girls, a very notable band. One of the inclusion criteria for music is "Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable", so this clearly qualifies under that criterion at least. I've removed the tag. 07:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
My apologies
editMy apologies for not being more patient while reading guidelines. I have added a more recent reference.--Delamorte 22:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Delamorte
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kobus!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927200401/http://www.citizen.co.za/index/article.aspx?pDesc=36809%2C1%2C22 to http://www.citizen.co.za/index/article.aspx?pDesc=36809%2C1%2C22
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kobus!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927162413/http://www.litnet.co.za/cgi-bin/giga.cgi?cmd=cause_dir_news_item&cause_id=1270&news_id=98580&cat_id=201 to http://www.litnet.co.za/cgi-bin/giga.cgi?cmd=cause_dir_news_item&cause_id=1270&news_id=98580&cat_id=201
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)