Talk:Kociewie dialect

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chełmno–Kociewie–Warmia dialect

Latest comment: 3 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Wondering if this new page leaves the Chełmno–Kociewie–Warmia dialect redundant - which always seemed a bit of a sticking plaster. Wikociewie (talk) 21:14, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's an old analysis by Nitsch, things have changed since then. Vininn126 (talk) 05:12, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Wikociewie I updated Chełmno–Kociewie–Warmia dialect. It might still be worth having around as it was one of the original analyses, but it at least points to the modern interpretation. If you wanna send it through the deletion process, I also wouldn't be opposed. Vininn126 (talk) 18:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply