Talk:KodakCoin

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article KodakCoin, along with other pages relating to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the KodakCoin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cryptocurrency Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dubious claims in article

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Business Insider, the main source used here to actually call KodakOne and KodakCoin (the latter announced much later) a cryptocurrency, just because it's using blockchain, tokens, and online payments (a typical mistake like on other Wikipedia articles, where PayPal and its ancestors are basically called the original cryptocurrency), gives a 404. The simple fact that a Kodak CEO used blockchain and cryptocurrency in the same sentence as two new web technologies confusing many people as to what they actually are is not a good proof either that KodakOne and KodakCoin were ever actually meant to be cryptocurrency. Many sources that also claimed Kodak would be out of existence for years, ever since chapt 11., that all that would be left would be a name and brand "bought by a British hedgefund investor buying garbage brands", and other nonsense about Kodak over the years went on to claim KodakOne would be "cryptocurrency".

Next, the claim that the entire project was "delayed indefinitely" "after questions were raised about the vetting process" is not found in the USA TODAY source used for that claim. That USA TODAY article actually only speaks of "several weeks" of delay, after one single source, the New York Times, complained that they couldn't understand what KodakOne was supposed to be, and the way it's cited by USA TODAY leaves it entirely open whether the NYT article had anything to do with that delay. The way our Wikipedia article here phrases it ATM makes it appear as if Kodak then came up with an entirely new idea of SAFTs as a flimsy excuse of an answer towards the NYT what KodakOne was supposed to be is also utter nonsense. It was simply what Kodak had intended to do all along and there was no "indefinite delay", it was just delayed from January to May.

Next, the source used in the lead to report the closing down of KodakOne in 2020 is an obscure private blog that mainly seems to exist to badmouth all forms of legal enforcement of copyright (such as the one intended by KodakOne) and champion all kinds of cryptocurrency for the purpose of money laundry and circumventing laws such as copyright. Even four months later, CNN.com reported in 2021 that KodakOne was still on-going: [1].

Furthermore, our Wikipedia article uses an Ars Technica article further down for that same claim of closure, where this time, the source dates as far back as from 2018 already, where that 2018 Ars Technica article doesn't say that KodakOne or KodakCoin were ended or its website "deleted" as is claimed in our Wikipedia article. All that it says is that the tech for KodakOne came from an older fundraiser made by the owner of RYDE and where the old fundraiser was closed down when Kodak partnered with RYDE. So it was *NOT* the KodakOne platform with the KodakCoin that was closed, although our Wikipedia article here pointing to that source claims it was KodakOne that was closed.

Overall, this is a shoddy use of sources all over the article, to make the article claim things that most of the time are not even found in the sources even just in the slightest. 2003:DA:CF4E:6331:6C66:8D6:995C:6B96 (talk) 22:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic