This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The first two vowels are really pronounced identically. For Sephardim, the first is kammetz kattan, the second is hatef-kammetz; but both are pronounced identically, and the sound is typically transliterated o. For Ashkenazim, both are kammetz, typically transliterated o. (But the second kammetz, being a hatef-kammetz, may be reduced in some Ashkenazic pronunciations, legitimizing the translteration "kodshim.")
I will recommend another move, to "Kodoshim" -- חנינא
The second is a hataf-kammatz? I thought those could not occur on a dalet.
When I had the page moved here, it was based partly on he:קמץ (see the very bottom). According to that, if anything, the only other grammatical alternative is "Kadashim." --EliyakT·C06:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
I stand corrected regarding the second vowel. "Kodoshim" remains an accurate Ashkenazic pronunciation, but as all of the other sedarim are given Sephardic vowelization, I agree that the move to "Kodashim" should remain. -- חנינא
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
As per other Sedarim, individual tractates with no articles should not redirect back to this article. Not sure how to cancel the redirect and make the relevant articles into stubs, can someone please lend a hand? Frikle22:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.