Talk:Kongō-class ironclad
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
Kongō-class ironclad has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 16, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Kongō-class ironclad appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 September 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kongō-class ironclad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 12:44, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
I'll aim to review this one tonight as well. Miyagawa (talk) 12:44, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Ok, I've given it a read through and there is a couple of very minor issues.
- In some places you use "Kongō-class" and others simply "Kongō class" (with no dash). Ideally these should be the same.
- Not exactly, the hyphen is used for compound adjectives like Kongō-class ships, no hyphen is used for Kongō class because there isn't a compound adjective.
- The individual ships should be linked to in the prose of the main article. I think they both first appear in the third paragraph of Propulsion.
Other than that, awesome work as normal. Always enjoy your articles. Miyagawa (talk) 08:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)