Talk:Korah

Latest comment: 21 days ago by Hskoppek in topic cause of revolt

Untitled

edit

Why is this article part of the Rational Skepticism area of Wikipedia?Yendor of yinn (talk) 03:27, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have deleted this category
BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

In the Indonesian language, the term for treasure is "Harta Karun" meaning is Karun's treasure.

edit

I'm afraid this sentence does not make sense. I don't speak the Indonesian language, but if "Harta Karun" means "Karun's treasure" then surely the word for "treasure" is "Harta"? BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're right, it doesn't. As another non-speaker of Indonesian, I assume that the phrase refers to an especially large treasure - the epitome of treasure. Another possibility (from a quick Google search) is "hidden treasure". If someone finds a definitive, sourced explanation, please add it. Yitz711 (talk) 10:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Some older English translations, as well as the Douay Bible, spell the name Core"

edit

Which English translations spell the name 'Core' apart from the Douay Bible? The KJV, the 1599 Geneva Bible and the Wycliffe Bible all have the name 'Korah'.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Korah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Uncited content from IP that has made bad edits elsewhere

edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Korah&diff=prev&oldid=554950685 has stood here for years, but I just had occasion to revert a wholly false edit from this IP address at Jack Block Park, and there is no citation for the edit here. I know nothing of the topic, so I am not editing; this is just a heads-up to whoever is working on this article. - Jmabel | Talk 07:05, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Psalms of the Sons of Korah

edit

It’s commonly believed that this superscript to several Psalms (87 and 88 for example) refer to the same Korah. Is there any reason not to mention it in the article? I didn’t see it in a quick review. Jtrevor99 (talk) 16:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

cause of revolt

edit

This sentence needs further elaboration: "Modern Jewish reform and secular interpretations of the Korah revolt supply new causes for the revolt to reflect new agendas and concerns of the authors." Just ststing some references it not sufficient, as it leaves the reader in the dark regarding said the "new causes". hskoppek (talk) 08:37, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply