Talk:Korean War/Archive 13
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Korean War. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
Pic caption correction
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Per the above talk thread, image caption for the pic of the broken gate (second row, right) is likely incorrect, due to incorrect info in the source for the pic.
Replace the caption with: A gate of Hwaseong Fortress in Suwon, heavily damaged during the war.[1] 211.43.120.242 (talk) 08:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "War, the Everyday, and Hope". National Museum of Korean Contemporary History. Retrieved July 11, 2024.
Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2024
| | This edit request to Korean War has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Korean conflict was said to have started in 1948, according to the article. Therefore, I would like for the upper text to be changed from 1945 to 1948. 171.244.185.182 (talk) 04:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- No it does not. Slatersteven (talk) 10:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Formatting a column about losses
Hello dear anonymous people, I have not yet mastered editing and would like to get some advice before making edits. Long ago or not very long ago, the template about losses included the flags and losses of each country. I think it might be worth returning it? In my opinion, such a column, purely aesthetically, will look better for the article. What do you think ? Hikka1999 (talk) 20:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- See Talk:Korean War/Archive 12#Chinese casualties and the consensus to remove. Cinderella157 (talk) 23:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
- Per the above, we do not really have an authoritative number. Slatersteven (talk) 18:35, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Um, so it’s better not to indicate any? And what is the logic if the article indicates the losses of the parties, but for some reason they cannot be indicated in the template? Hikka1999 (talk) 18:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Because a template cant deal with complexities as it is a Summay (of the lede), of a summary (the lede). Slatersteven (talk) 18:45, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Um, so it’s better not to indicate any? And what is the logic if the article indicates the losses of the parties, but for some reason they cannot be indicated in the template? Hikka1999 (talk) 18:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)