Talk:Korean dance

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

China

edit

Why was "China" removed in this edit? It's always good to use an edit summary to explain why you're deleting something, when you do that. Badagnani 04:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Because China did neither rule Korea like Japan nor oppress Korea to discontinue the Korean traditional dance at all from the early through the mid 20th century, the sentence clearly included "a lie". Korea rather got affected by Chinese dances during the Joseon period such as Dangak jeongjae, which will be added on this article in future. --Appletrees 04:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Interesting, thanks for the explanation. It seems accurate from what I know of the history. Badagnani 04:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Korean dance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:06, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply