Talk:Korean pottery and porcelain
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Korean pottery and porcelain article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Contemporary ceramicists
edithttp://iskaiart.com/press/traditional-yet-contemporary/ lists twelve leading ceramicists from Korea.Kdammers (talk) 08:23, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Korean pottery and porcelain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5kwPni5fJ?url=http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761568150_4/Pottery.html to http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761568150_4/Pottery.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webcitation.org/query?id=1257012851343397
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webcitation.org/5kwsOvVYi
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Korean pottery and porcelain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050212184953/http://myhome.shinbiro.com/~mss1/koryo.html to http://myhome.shinbiro.com/~mss1/koryo.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041207032037/http://www.hawaii.edu/korea/bibliography/archaeology.htm to http://www.hawaii.edu/korea/bibliography/archaeology.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050214102848/http://www.artsandartists.org/exhpages/korea/images.html to http://www.artsandartists.org/exhpages/korea/images.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050306074138/http://www.philamuseum.org/exhibitions/exhibits/mountaindreams.shtml to http://www.philamuseum.org/exhibitions/exhibits/mountaindreams.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Link on Wikimedia Commons
editI tried to Integrate images from the gallery and texts in this article. The gallery has been overproportionally large in comparison with the small text volume in this article. Thus, I trimmed and rearranged the gallery in chronological order. We have already direct link on Wikimedia Commons to Pottery of Korea, providing plenty of images on Korean Pottery. Conprix (talk) 22:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- Well I have done the same thing better, by splitting up the over-large gallery to mini-galleries. There are always images on Commons (a different project); that is not in itself an excuse for reducing the number of images of an inherently visual subject. You didn't "trim" the gallery - you removed almost all of it. I have reduced the number somewhat, and of course kept the chronological order. Ideally the text will be expanded. Please don't edit war over this. Johnbod (talk) 23:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- There are too many mini-galleries, which look quite unencyclopedic. The galleries are still overproportionally large in comparison with the small text volume in this article. I tried to Integrate images from the gallery and texts in this article rather then removing the images. First of all, the text should be extended so that more images from the gallery can be Integrated into it, rather than producing plenty of mini-galleries in the article. And I hope you will not to edit war over this. Conprix (talk) 00:29, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Well, I disagree on these points - there is nothing "unencyclopedic" about mini-galleries, which most FAs on visual subjects have had for many years. You did remove the great majority of the images - the edit history is clear. Johnbod (talk) 15:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- It is unencyclopedic as long as the plenty of galleries overwhelm the small text volume in this article. The edit history is clear, that I moved some images from the gallery and incorporated them into the relevant texts or sections instead of simply removing them. Conprix (talk) 18:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Really? Strange then that your edit reduced the article size by 6185 bytes! Johnbod (talk) 02:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- Please note that I made my comment after this edit It is clear, that I moved some images from the gallery and incorporated them into the adjacent texts. And in my last comments i did not deny that I removed images. Conprix (talk) 10:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
- Really? Strange then that your edit reduced the article size by 6185 bytes! Johnbod (talk) 02:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- It is unencyclopedic as long as the plenty of galleries overwhelm the small text volume in this article. The edit history is clear, that I moved some images from the gallery and incorporated them into the relevant texts or sections instead of simply removing them. Conprix (talk) 18:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- Well, I disagree on these points - there is nothing "unencyclopedic" about mini-galleries, which most FAs on visual subjects have had for many years. You did remove the great majority of the images - the edit history is clear. Johnbod (talk) 15:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- There are too many mini-galleries, which look quite unencyclopedic. The galleries are still overproportionally large in comparison with the small text volume in this article. I tried to Integrate images from the gallery and texts in this article rather then removing the images. First of all, the text should be extended so that more images from the gallery can be Integrated into it, rather than producing plenty of mini-galleries in the article. And I hope you will not to edit war over this. Conprix (talk) 00:29, 1 August 2021 (UTC)