Goal

edit

So what did they support?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  20:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Lithuanian revival not denying its PLC heritage. --Lysytalk 07:26, 8 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Some questions

edit

The following para

Priest Antanas Baranauskas (1835-1902) belonged to the early Krajowcy, and he thought of Lithuanian national activists as a group of Polish separatists. Even though he wrote about "our dear nation" in the Lithuanian language, he denounced political independence of Lithuania.

looks unclear to me. How Lithuanian national activist could be regarded as Polish separatist? (maybe it means a kind of political equivalence? then some rewording would apply, perhaps). Does the last sentence (denouncing political independence of Lithuania) caracterizes Krajowcy group? If so, I believe it should be mentioned and explained what does it mean when compared to their program of creating a state. If, however, it was a personal conviction of the priest, maybe a better place for it is in his proper article? --Beaumont (@) 16:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

In essence, Baranauskas thought of both Poles and Lithuanians as one nation and that cutting out independent Lithuania would be unfair division of one nation. So Lithuanians seeking independence were just stupid Poles wanting a country for themselves, which was, of course, unacceptable. Denouncing political independence of Lithuania goes more or less for all krajowcy (BTW, Polish sources should be more detailed about krajowcy because Lithuanian ones just mention them in the passing), but especially the early ones. Baranauskas need to be mentioned here as he is a good example. Renata 15:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

English source

edit

...that mentions the term 'krajowcy': [1].-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  13:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Römer - best know of Krajowcy?

edit

Such a claim needs a citation. Removing citation requests is considered disruptive, see WP:V and WP:CITE. Burden of citation is on the editor adding such a claim, or defending it. PS. I really don't understand the problem here; it is indisputable that we was a well known member of krajowcy - I'd think such a claim would be a good compromise, and wouldn't require a citation. But if somebody wants to claim he was the best known - please cite it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 03:29, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Would you please define "best known". How many google hits and/or scrapz should be povided? Or printed books would suffice. Asking just in case, to prevent possible edit wars--Lokyz (talk) 03:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
One google book which calls him best known krajowiec will do just fine. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 04:29, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
And printed book, hence, will not? Thank you for sincere answer.--Lokyz (talk) 04:36, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply