Talk:Kraków John Paul II International Airport

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the airport project.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Untitled

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

One question about the second paragraph: It says Ryanair wanted to start service from "this" airport. I just want to clarify, they wanted to start from John Paul II, not from Warsaw, right? -- Ortonmc 16:09, 17 Sep 2003 (UTC)

OK, another question. :-) Is the military airbase still in use, or would it be better described as "former military airbase"? -- Ortonmc 16:11, 17 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Yes, "this" mean Krakow airport. The second question: yes, this military airbase is still in use. The "first" airport was also opened on the area of this base. The "second" one - planned to be open 2004 - will also use some area of this base. But Polish army will still use the rest of the airbase. It was said that the American army was planning to develop this airbase as a NATO airbase, but it's only a gossip and totally different story. Thank you for the help Ortonmc!!! Slawojarek, 12:22, 19 Sep 2003 (CEST)

I can confirm. The military airbase (mostly focused on transport aircrafts) is still operational, and one of the major air transport hubs for Polish air force, used also on some NATO missions. https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_Baza_Lotnictwa_Transportowego for some extra details. They also support some military search and rescue operations (not sure if they are also used for civilian purposes). The runway and some other infrastructure is property of military. The civilian airport of course is a separate entity and not part of military airbase. 2A02:168:F609:0:7855:CA84:B8D8:C659 (talk) 16:30, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Getting there

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The location where the shuttle train from Krakow terminates can hardly be called a station. It's just a rough platform, without even a shelter or a ticket office or any other structure. It should be called a stop until it deserves anything better.
The '200m walk from the station' is a piece of airport propaganda. Yes, it would be 200 metres if you climbed across two (or more) fences. For the less physically able and/or daring it's at least twice the distance.
--Jotel 07:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ryanair will have 20 rotes from the airport. Well this's been a simple "u" missing for some time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mallitch (talk • contribs) 19:56, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Airlines & Destinations

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

So although I'm not familiar with how to create tables, something went wrong and the Airlines & Destinations table is all messed up. Additionally, the top destinations should have the city, then the country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.14.177.186 (talk) 04:35, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.airport-technology.com/projects/john-paul-international-airport-krakow-poland/
Triggered by \bairport-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 12:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic