A fact from Krepost Sveaborg appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article could dearly use copy editing and proofreading from a native english speaker. Also the naming system I used might not be the best: I used the swedish name Sveaborg for the Swedish period (pre-1808) and finnish Suomenlinna for Finnish period (after 1918), but divided the Russian period into two parts with the finnish term Viapori used for 1808-1914 and Krepost Sveaborg for 1914-1917. However, Viapori is used also as a finnish term for the Swedish-era Sveaborg, and the name of the fortress did not actually change during the expansion in First World War; should the name Krepost Sveaborg be used throughout the article for the Russian period?MKFI (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply